In Western culture, new baby girls are welcomed into the world with rosy pink layettes. Over time, the pale hues of infancy fade away, giving way to more keenly saturated pastels as a child creeps toward toddlerhood. Later, pink is frequently summoned for balloons at birthday parties or streamers on bicycles, for hair ribbons and ballet costumes and
Hello Kitty accessories. True, there's
Pink Floyd and the
Pink Panther (and yes, even Picasso had a
pink period) but at the end of the day, the color pink basically telegraphs the XX gene. Progressive thinkers (and the designers who love them) may resist such a gendered historical reading of color but there it is: a girly cliché.
Recently, however, the paradigm of little-girl-pink has shifted, supplanted by a new, more purposeful pink: it's a color that conjures a still-female, yet altogether different message. Today, pink is the color of breast cancer awareness.
In the coming year alone,
more than 200,000 individuals will be diagnosed with breast cancer, and 40,000 will die from the disease. What began with a small pink ribbon has grown into a big pink empire, raising funds for research through the sales of a million different pink-branded products and more impoortantly, boosting awareness of an extraordinarily pervasive health issue. Everywhere you look, there is evidence of an astonishing range of partnerships that reveal themselves with more pink things:
Neenah Paper,
Coach Watches,
Wrangler Jeans,
Barbie Dolls. The idea that a color has come to instantly represent an extraordinary cause is a brilliant example of the power of design.
And the brilliance here is in the simplicity of the idea: the notion of co-opting a color and making it your own.
Today, thanks to efforts that some are calling "punk capitalism", the color red is being used to help combat the AIDS epidemic. Working with The Global Fund and launch partners American Express, Converse, Gap, Giorgio Armani and Motorola (and "branded" if indeed you can brand a color, which it appears you can by
Wolff Olins)
Product (RED) is the brainchild of Bobby Shriver and U2's Bono. It's an idea that combines social idealism with grass-roots capitalism, but most of all, it's an idea that works because it's instantly recognizable: merging simplicity with ubiquity, you communicate while you saturate. (Personally, I also love the appropriation of all those verbs.) Pretty basic. And brilliant. Were it not for the celebrity heft included in the campaign (Kate Moss, Jennifer Garner, Steven Spielberg, to name a few) it smacks of the kind of original, if slightly idealistic "better-living-through-design" thinking that characterizes the best in graduate school thesis projects. It's deeply entrepreneurial, this Red project, yet it manages to also be rather enchanting. Their manifesto explains the simplicity of their win-win concept a business model, with heart:
"(RED) is not a charity. It is simply a business model. You buy (RED) stuff, we get the money, buy the pills and distribute them. They take the pills, stay alive, and continue to take care of their families and contribute socially and economically in their communities. If they don't get the pills, they die. We don't want them to die. We want to give them the pills. And we can. And you can. And it's easy. All you have to do is upgrade your choice."
Certainly, other brands have long claimed red as their own (
Coca-Cola and
Newsweek spring to mind), but this (Red) is different: it claims no material ownership, and paradoxically, might even be described as a kind of anti-brand. (A red iPod nano is still an iPod nano.) Still, red is quickly becoming pervasive, largely due to the instant, global, recognizability of a single basic color.
Which is, of course, highly subjective: one man's red is another man's blue. Or in my case, silver. Many years ago as a young designer, I made a presentation to a client for an identity I'd been working on for ages. The identity itself consisted of two colored squares, side by side, upon which the corporate moniker was to be superimposed. The diptych approach had been approved, but the coordinating colors proved something of a challenge. I paced my presentation slowly, eventually unveiling a particular option that included a silver, metallic square which I had optimistically (and wrongly, it soon turned out) predicted as the favorite. My client frowned. "I don't know about the
silvah," she whined to her partner. "The silvah doesn't send me.
Does it send you, Oiving?" Irving wasn't sent either. But the silver itself was indeed sent straight to the cutting room floor.
Where interpretation is concerned, no color is more subjective than a primary color. Take blue, for instance: the color of the sky, of the sea, of royalty and flags and navy regalia. With something old, new and borrowed, it's the only color allowed to penetrate the sanctity of wedding white. "True" blue, as it is often called, is the elder statesman of the primaries perhaps because it so unequivocally projects a kind of implicit nobility. Blue says classicism, strength. And wealth.
Many years ago, I remember Paul Rand telling me about a project he was working on for
American Express. He created a series of sketches to demonstrate potential color variations for their platinum credit card, and one of them was instantly recognizable almost jarringly so as the trademark aquatic blue of Tiffany & Co. It seemed kind of sneaky, this notion of using a color that so instantly conjured the identity of another company: but that, Mr. Rand assured me, was exactly the point. Tiffany blue said expensive, rich, elite: to cue the audience through the inflection of this particular shade was genius.
Genius it may have been, but Rand's client disagreed. (Speaking of the cutting room floor and rather comforting to know that even Mr. Rand endured defeat, isn't it?) Yet the idea stuck with me. Like breast cancer awareness pink, Tiffany blue says you can't afford me. Like Product (Red), it immediately connects to an idea in this case instant elegance, pure luxury, exalted status the grandfather of
bling. Interestingly, "Tiffany Blue" is actually trademarked: it's Pantone Number
1837, which corresponds to the year Tiffany & Co. was founded.
Which makes (Red) and (Pink) all the more remarkable. "Mere colour," wrote Oscar Wilde, "unspoiled by meaning, and unallied with definite form, can speak to the soul in a thousand different ways." Unallied with form it may be, but when color connects to an
institution, a
purpose or a
cause, something extraordinary takes place. It goes far beyond branding, because it hints at the emotional degree to which we respond to something that transcends language. To speak to the soul may seem a lofty goal, but it is by no means an impossible one.
Comments [26]
11.17.06
01:08
Public color vs. private color. In response to the global notion of the meaning of color; the honor, nobility, wealth, compassion, and awareness color can imbue (im-hue), I find that color is seldomly private (except in my memory of things and in dreams). I think this illustrates my point the best: I invited friends over to my place to show off the design, the color on the walls, and the careworn knicknacks conditioning the interior experience, only to be on the receiving end of this comment: "Wow - you're whole color thing - it's so pottery barn". I was devastated. No! I screamed (not really) It's not "them". This color is "me".
How can color in it's ubiquitous abstracted commercial platform, conversely signify the personal?
11.17.06
01:16
The primary association of red in the 20th century, of course, wasn't a brand, a company, or a product. It was a movement: communism. Is this re-association with AIDS only possible because we're now a generation removed from the Cold War? Surely in the 1980's nobody would have promoted a "RED" campaign for anything.
Question: how many things can one color mean in the same cultural context?
11.17.06
02:39
I would have to disagree that color is seldomly private. In my opinion, although there is a push to "brand" a color for a particular corporation or charity, color still remains quite personal. In my circle of co-horts, I am known for Magenta. It sometimes shows up in my work or on my clothing, but it is linked, in my oh-so-small world, to me. It is my branded color. How much more personal can it be?
We may culturally share a The meaning of color, no matter what its intended communication, will always be up to the observer and their particular viewpoint.
11.17.06
04:50
We may culturally share a The meaning of color, no matter what its intended communication, will always be up to the observer and their particular viewpoint.
Posted by: James D. Nesbitt on November 17, 2006 04:50 PM
highlights an essential aspect of using colour to commuicate a value or quality. It's highly contextualized culturally and socially - in different cultures, the very same colour may indicate almost exactly opposing views. For example, in India, pure unsullied white without ornamentation is the colour of mourning and death. No bride would ever dream of wearing such a colour, so much so that Indian Christian brides choose shades of cream with gold or silver accents. Similarly, red and gold are extremely auspicious colours in both India and China. All brides wear some hue or combination of these two shades.
11.17.06
06:50
VR/
11.17.06
11:24
m/
11.18.06
01:12
"I would have to disagree that color is seldomly private. In my opinion, although there is a push to "brand" a color for a particular corporation or charity, color still remains quite personal."
Like most anything that has emotional context and can trigger emotional responses, color has private associations as well as public ones: our inherited associations and our private connotations inform each other other. Mythologist Joseph Campbel said that "the myth is the public dream and the dream is the private myth."
Color, too, is its own mythologic character: we internalize it, react to it, and spit something out i response to it. In turn, we are further shaped by cultural meanings which have been spat out by our ancestors, colleagues, and children. We shape the world and it shapes us.
To say anything is public without being private is almost meaningless. They always shape each other.
11.18.06
09:28
You also comment about how great it is that color can really come to be inextricably connected to something like an institution, purpose or cause, tying your comments up with the following quote by Oscar Wilde: "mere colour, unspoiled by meaning, and unallied with definite form, can speak to the soul in a thousand different ways." You're missing something here because in that quote Oscar Wilde is talking about color that's "unspoiled by meaning". The institutions, purposes and causes to which you refer all have meanings. Therefore the colors about which you talk are not the 'mere colours' Oscar Wilde is talking about. He would disagree that color, when used in the ways you are talking about, 'can speak to the human soul'.
©7 of Spades
11.18.06
09:42
11.18.06
03:10
Remember, the 1920s and 1930s were extremely consumer oriented. In the pre-1920s rural society one made clothes for the baby. In the post-1920s urban society one bought clothes for the baby. Marketing and advertising were emerging as specialties, and an modern graphics designer would find them familiar today. Of course child raising guilt with the broad range of taboos and dos for expectant and new mothers dates back much further.
11.19.06
05:33
11.19.06
06:47
Say CHARTREUSE aloud. It's a gentle sigh.
ahh Pink! A lovely color that bears no relation to it's verbal expression. And the verbal expression of chartreuse does nothing to prepare one for the citron yellow-green it is attached to.
What is pink but rose, rhubarb, salmon, terra cotta, red rock? How much black do you have to add before it stops being pink?
And what about blue? Where does powder blue stop and robins egg blue begin and power blue pick up? How much black do you add to give the hue gravitas?
If we look closely at living things around us we will find expressions of color represented in unexepected and powerful ways.
11.19.06
08:10
I recall listening to a radio discussion a couple of years ago (on the BBC no less) between marketeers and advertisers, about how brands could target the "pink pound", ie the disposable income of gay couples, who are (apparently) invariably wealthier than their heterosexual counterparts.
11.20.06
08:49
11.20.06
09:13
My color, á la James Nesbitt's comment, is orange/yellow. If you laid my portfolio spread out on the ground and took a picture from way up high, it would have a fairly warm tone.
The timing on this article was pretty convenient for me. I was thinking more and more about people marketing color, as well as people marketing charity. Perhaps this is the start of a color coded charity era. "The proceeds from this benefit will be donated to Pink, Red, Yellow, Periwinkle, and PMS 1837..."
11.20.06
09:50
11.20.06
12:20
11.20.06
12:41
By the way, how did designers and artists become so associated with the color black? Anybody?
11.20.06
01:51
11.21.06
10:33
I'm gonna guess it has something to do with not having to wash one's clothes that often. :)
11.21.06
01:39
We associate pink with softness, sweetness, and inocuousness. Little girls are encouraged to crave My Little Pony and Hello Kitty and wear endless amounts of pink lace, fake fur and patent leather.
I think there's a connection. Smart, independent girls shake off this pink haze early on. They instinctively know that it paints them as submissive and weak.
Maybe the coopting of pink by the breast cancer awareness campaign and others can turn the tide and remove the stigma. But as long as we continue to foster the Pink Princess model of girlhood, I have my doubts.
11.22.06
01:59
I once was told that pink was the least popular color in the world with regard to product. In terms of awareness however, it's pulling out from the pack.
11.23.06
10:30
http://www.amazon.com/Pink-Think-Becoming-Uneasy-Lessons/dp/0393323544
11.23.06
05:42
Trend color now: bright orange (cingular/vonage)
Next Trend color: mint/lime green
..youll see.
11.30.06
08:29
When we decorated our baby room (girl), it was a cheerful yellow all the way, with light blue accents. I hate pink.
11.30.06
10:08